On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 03:13:05 GMT, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Latest comment from Phil related to not disabling SystemTray for Gnome>=45 >> needs to be taken care. >> Also do we need to worry about this issue being regression from some Gnome >> version like 3.38.0 and we need to disable SystemTray only between 3.38.0 & >> < 45 Or we are okay with disabling it for all version less than 45? > > A fair question. My understanding of how Gnome vs Gnome Shell vs GTK version > naming interact here is definitely not as clear as I'd like but I understand > anything that is Gnome 3.X or 40+ (and < 44.1) is affected, leaving only the > even older systems out there as theoretically working. ie anything in at > least the last 5-6 years is broken. I'd like Alexander to chime in here on > this too. > Latest comment from Phil related to not disabling SystemTray for Gnome>=45 > needs to be taken care. With the current version string format, this should not happen unless the executable is somewhere else, environment variables are stripped, etc. However, since this is a quick fix, a more reliable way to do this will be done along with [JDK-8325914](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325914). > Also do we need to worry about this issue being regression from some Gnome > version like 3.38.0 and we need to disable SystemTray only between 3.38.0 & < > 45 Or we are okay with disabling it for all version less than 45? The 3.38.0 was just an example of a different numbering convention, I can reproduce the issue on the 3.28.3 on OL7.9. So the lower limit is not known yet. So this is intentional, as an urgent fix. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17860#discussion_r1490324858
