On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:04:58 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> Alexander Zvegintsev has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   IllegalThreadStateException
>
> src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/UNIXToolkit.java line 307:
> 
>> 305:                  | InterruptedException
>> 306:                  | NumberFormatException ignored) {
>> 307:         }
> 
> seems `exitValue` can throw IllegalThreadStateException but it is not caught 
> here..any reason or missed?

Thanks for catching this. Updated.

> src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/X11/XSystemTrayPeer.java line 58:
> 
>> 56:         peerInstance = this;
>> 57: 
>> 58:         UNIXToolkit tk = (UNIXToolkit)Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit();
> 
> can we always cast to UNIXToolkit...shouldn't "instanceof" check be done here 
> for SunToolkit or HeadlessToolkit instance, say?

It's already checked at this point.
SystemTray and its peers are only initialized in a non-headless environment.

see for `initializeSystemTrayIfNeeded()`:

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/a0e5e16afbd19f6396f0af2cba954225a357eca8/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/SystemTray.java#L173-175

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/a0e5e16afbd19f6396f0af2cba954225a357eca8/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/SystemTray.java#L218-221

> src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/X11/XSystemTrayPeer.java line 94:
> 
>> 92:             return;
>> 93:         }
>> 94: 
> 
> What about `getTrayIconSize`?  Should we allow to return 
> TRAY_ICON_HEIGHT/TRAY_ICON_WIDTH if disable system tray is on?

In the unsupported case, you don't have an instance to call this method.

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/a0e5e16afbd19f6396f0af2cba954225a357eca8/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/SystemTray.java#L179-182

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17860#discussion_r1490938221
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17860#discussion_r1490947308
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17860#discussion_r1490953562

Reply via email to