On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:11:59 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <[email protected]> wrote:
> `positionTestUI()` option is added to PassFailJFrame (PFJ).
>
> With this change multiple UI can be positioned using the PFJ new builder
> pattern by providing implementation for the Functional Interface
> `PositionWindows.positionTestWindows(List<? extends Window>
> testWindows,InstructionUI instructionUI)` in the test code.
>
> Since the position implementation is done in test code it allows flexibility
> as the user can add custom positioning code per test UI requirements.
>
> Usage:
>
> PassFailJFrame.builder()
> .title("Test Instructions")
> .instructions(INSTRUCTIONS)
> .rows(int)
> .columns(int)
> .testUI(<TestClass::createAndShowUI>)
> .positionTestUI(<TestClass::positionMultiTestUI>)
> .build()
> .awaitAndCheck();
>
> where positionMultiTestUI is the implementation for positioning of multiple
> test windows for `PositionWindows.positionTestWindows(List<? extends Window>
> testWindows,InstructionUI instructionUI)`
>
> @aivanov-jdk has demonstrated custom test UI positioning in this PR:
> **[8294156: Demo positioning of multiple test
> windows](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/15721)**
> There's an enhancement
> [JDK-8317116](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317116): Provide layouts
> for multiple test UI in PassFailJFrame to provide a set of common layouts for
> tests to re-use. It would avoid code duplication for the most common layouts
> like columns or rows to the right or bottom of the instruction UI.
Update PR description with the PR link related to JDK-8317116 in case anyone
wants to explore custom positioning of multiple UIs.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21023#issuecomment-2354024837
