On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 21:38:36 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <[email protected]> wrote:

>> `positionTestUI()` option is added to PassFailJFrame (PFJ).
>> 
>> With this change multiple UI can be positioned using the PFJ new builder 
>> pattern by providing implementation for the Functional Interface 
>> `PositionWindows.positionTestWindows(List<? extends Window> 
>> testWindows,InstructionUI instructionUI)` in the test code. 
>> 
>> Since the position implementation is done in test code it allows flexibility 
>> as the user can add custom positioning code as per test UI requirements.
>> 
>> Usage:
>> 
>> PassFailJFrame.builder()
>>                       .title("Test Instructions")
>>                       .instructions(INSTRUCTIONS)
>>                       .rows(int)
>>                       .columns(int)
>>                       .testUI(<TestClass::createAndShowUI>)
>>                       .positionTestUI(<TestClass::positionMultiTestUI>)
>>                       .build()
>>                       .awaitAndCheck();
>> 
>> where positionMultiTestUI is the implementation for positioning of multiple 
>> test windows for `PositionWindows.positionTestWindows(List<? extends Window> 
>> testWindows,InstructionUI instructionUI)`
>> 
>> @aivanov-jdk has demonstrated custom test UI positioning in this PR: 
>> **[8294156: Demo positioning of multiple test 
>> windows](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/15721)**
>
> Harshitha Onkar has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   removed errorenous check

Marked as reviewed by aivanov (Reviewer).

test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers/PassFailJFrame.java line 1264:

> 1262:          * @throws IllegalStateException if the {@code positionWindows} 
> field
> 1263:          *              is already set, or if neither a windows list 
> creator
> 1264:          *              nor a list of test windows has been provided

Suggestion:

         * @throws IllegalStateException if the {@code positionWindows} field
         *              is already set

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21023#pullrequestreview-2309011043
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21023#discussion_r1762784996

Reply via email to