On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 04:31:19 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Seems there is a format for this backout/redo and yours is not in >>> accordance...See https://openjdk.org/guide/#backing-out-a-change, original >>> should be cloned and new JBS should be in form of "REDO: [old bug >>> description]" >> >> Do I need to close the REDO bug >> [JDK-8345089](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345089) and create a new >> one cloned with original issue now? >> What about the `Backout` issue? > >> > Seems there is a format for this backout/redo and yours is not in >> > accordance...See https://openjdk.org/guide/#backing-out-a-change, original >> > should be cloned and new JBS should be in form of "REDO: [old bug >> > description]" >> >> Do I need to close the REDO bug >> [JDK-8345089](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345089) and create a new >> one cloned with original issue now? What about the `Backout` issue? > > Better to follow the process and do the steps listed... @prsadhuk Updated the JBS title of [JDK-8345004](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345004) to reflect it as a backout issue. Only thing missing from the process is it should be craeted as a "sub-task" of REDO bug but I guess this should be ok as the bugs are linked properly. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22379#issuecomment-2502784254
