On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 06:58:38 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> probably these discussions may help >> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-July/007152.html >> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-October/007764.html > > And this https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-October/007772.html > (it has a looong discissuin thread) @mrserb Putting the discussions aside, does the suggested fix look good to you? As I said, border painting uses `clipRound` consistently: both in coordinate calculation and in thickness calculation. This approach resolves the problem reported. Looking at descriptions of `clipScale` and `clipRound`, it seems the former suits better… Yet it makes the rendering less consistent with other borders: using `clipScale` switches to 2-pixel and 3-pixel border at 1.50 and 2.50 correspondingly (from 1 and 2 with `clipRound`). In other cases, the border thickness also increases, which may be undesirable. Overall, there are 6 failures of the `ScaledLineBorderTest.java` test when the code in JDK uses `clipScale` instead of `clipRound`. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26025#discussion_r2175286281
