On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:44:39 GMT, Tejesh R <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > As @DamonGuy mentioned, a better way to deal with >>> > [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915) could be >>> > closing it as _Cannot reproduce_ and submitting a new bug to update >>> > `FrameLocation.java` and remove `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the problem >>> > list. >>> >>> Probably I'll capture screenshot on failure and deproblemlist it. If I >>> close the bug as _Cannot reproduce_ then it remains in problem listing, so >>> better way is to de-problemlist it and add screen capture. >> >> That's the point—you cannot reproduce the failure of `FrameLocation.java`, >> can you? >> >> Thus, the correct resolution is *Cannot Reproduce*. >> >> Adding a screenshot is not fixing the failure reported in >> [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915), it's an >> improvement for the test to have the more information to analyse the failure >> if it occurs again. This is why it's a new issue. >> >> 8305915 has to be removed from the PL, submit a new bug, or rather create a >> subtask of JDK-8305915, to remove both `FrameLocation.java` and >> `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the problem list. >> >> I strongly believe this approach creates a clearer bug history in JBS and >> clearer changelog in the JDK. This also makes backporting easier as well as >> dealing with test failures in older releases. >> >> Yes, submitting two new bugs creates more work but we're not in a rush here, >> and I think *it's worth the time*. >> >> I can submit the bugs for you if you prefer so. > > @aivanov-jdk @DamonGuy I've raised https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/27678 > PR for de-problemlisting the main bug. Once this is integrated, I'll close > the main bug as "Not-Reproducible".
> @TejeshR13 You can still use this PR to implement adding screenshots, just > change the subject of the PR to associate it with the new bugid. New bugid ? You want me to raise another JBS to handle adding screenshots ? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27366#issuecomment-3379430004
