On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:33:34 GMT, Damon Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > Error >>> > > ⚠️ 8305915 is used in problem lists: [test/jdk/ProblemList.txt] >>> > >>> > >>> > However, the problem list only contains another test under the 8305915 >>> > bug ID. >>> > > java/awt/Frame/SizeMinimizedTest.java 8305915 linux-x64 >>> > >>> > >>> > And that is what we should pay attention to. >>> >>> We should resolve this problem. >>> >>> Tejesh problem-listed `SizeMinimizedTest.java` in #18448. The PR >>> description states: >>> >>> > Automated the test SizeMinimizedTest.java. Since the test is failing >>> > Linux arch (Maybe related to the bug - >>> > [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915)), the test is >>> > problem listed for Linux arch until the issue is fixed/further >>> > investigation is done. >>> >>> If `SizeMinimizedTest.java` still fails, it's time to file a new bug for >>> it. A sub-task of the new bug should be used to fix up the bugid in the >>> problem list. >> >> I tested `SizeMinimizedTest.java` running in CI and no failure is observed. >> It's true that I had added the test for different bug ID long time which is >> wrong. Should we just move it to another JBS and PL it while removing >> 8305915 PL ? I guess we should handle both the issue separately with >> different BugID ? > >> I tested SizeMinimizedTest.java running in CI and no failure is observed. >> It's true that I had added the test for different bug ID long time which is >> wrong. Should we just move it to another JBS and PL it while removing >> 8305915 PL ? I guess we should handle both the issue separately with >> different BugID ? > > At the very least, this info should be added to the current JBS issue. Maybe > update the title and the summary of the issue to also include the removal of > `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the PL. > > > As @DamonGuy mentioned, a better way to deal with > > > [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915) could be > > > closing it as _Cannot reproduce_ and submitting a new bug to update > > > `FrameLocation.java` and remove `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the problem > > > list. > > > > > > Probably I'll capture screenshot on failure and deproblemlist it. If I > > close the bug as _Cannot reproduce_ then it remains in problem listing, so > > better way is to de-problemlist it and add screen capture. > > That's the point—you cannot reproduce the failure of `FrameLocation.java`, > can you? > > Thus, the correct resolution is _Cannot Reproduce_. > > Adding a screenshot is not fixing the failure reported in > [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915), it's an > improvement for the test to have the more information to analyse the failure > if it occurs again. This is why it's a new issue. > > 8305915 has to be removed from the PL, submit a new bug, or rather create a > subtask of JDK-8305915, to remove both `FrameLocation.java` and > `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the problem list. > > I strongly believe this approach creates a clearer bug history in JBS and > clearer changelog in the JDK. This also makes backporting easier as well as > dealing with test failures in older releases. > > Yes, submitting two new bugs creates more work but we're not in a rush here, > and I think _it's worth the time_. > > I can submit the bugs for you if you prefer so. Sure then, sub tasking would be better idea, I'll do that. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27366#issuecomment-3376425131
