On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:41:34 GMT, Jayathirth D V <[email protected]> wrote:
>In the original bug the decrease in memory footprint achieved by clearing
>these intermediate vectors was minimal compared to other changes.
It still bumps the required memory significantly in some cases after the patch
if there are no gaps, no? My point was not about an additional optimization,
but instead about replacing this logic of cleaning on each gap with
cleaning("absorb") "on add".
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31971#discussion_r3669019162
