Rich, Should I send in a CA and add ancestry verification and error handling or is this an unacceptable change?
-Matt On Sep 15, 12:22 am, Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I modifed clojure/genclass to support adding exposer methods for > protected fields in classes higher up the hierarchy than the > superclass. Interfaces should also be supported too. > > The patch can be found > here:http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/genclass_exposers.diff > > An example with the new syntax: > > (gen-and-load-class 'motive.visual.TestSimpleGame > :extends com.jme.app.SimpleGame > :exposes '{[com.jme.app.BaseSimpleGame rootNode] > {:get getRootNode :set setRootNode}}) > > The original exposes format is supported too, which defaults to the > superclass. There's currently no check done to verify that the class/ > interface specified as the home of the field is a part of the > hierarchy of the new class. I'll likely add that and clean things up > a bit after I get some sleep and feedback. > > -Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
