On 8 Nov., 20:24, Phlex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There must be some reason for CL to have it as a macro > (call-argument-limit perhaps ?)
I don't know, but I suspect it might be matter of aesthetics. In CL, PROGN can't be a function for various reasons (off the top of my head: multiple-value returns and special treatment at the top level), so it'd be a bit weird and maybe even confusing for PROG1 or PROG2 to be such. Matthias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
