This is a reasonable idea, and I would find it useful as well. However, it might be easier (and more appropriate) to make tagging a feature of the documentation website that has come up here.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Mark Volkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sometimes it can be time consuming for someone new to Clojure, like > myself, to find an existing function that does what they need. I think > this would be easier if the standard functions were grouped in some > meaningful way. For example, all these functions retrieve items from a > sequence: first, second, rest, take, leave. I'm sure I omitted many. > > Could function metadata be used to help with this? What if functions > had a piece of metadata named "categories". Each function could be in > any number of categories. There could be function similar to find-doc > that finds all the functions in a given category. The hardest part > might be coming up with good category names. > > -- > R. Mark Volkmann > Object Computing, Inc. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
