>> I think clojure.lang.Repl should translate its args to the new
>> format and
>> call clojure.main/-main:
>>
>> old: clojure.lang.Repl file1 file2 -- a b c
>> new: clojure.main -i file1 -i file2 -r a b c
>>
>> Similarly for clojure.lang.Script:
>>
>> old: clojure.lang.Script file1 file2 file3 -- a b c
>> new: clojure.main -i file1 -i file2 file3 a b c
>>
>
> Ok, so calls to them won't change but they will delegate to main/tell.
They will delegate to clojure.main/-main. Then we'll document only
clojure.main as the way to run a script or launch Clojure's repl.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>> [2] A single "-e" or "--eval" option should be allowed to contain
>> multiple
>> forms and it should evaluate them sequentially. There are cases where
>> wrapping multiple forms in a "do" does not work and writing
>>
>> -e (this) -e (that) -e (the-other)
>>
>> is tedious compared to
>>
>> -e "(this) (that) (the-other)"
>>
>
> This (-e) seems rather unimportant, but I wonder when does 'do' not
> work?
'do' doesn't work when an early form uses a namespace and a later form
depends on that.
java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main -e "(use 'clojure.set)" -e "(union
#{:a} #{:b})"
works.
java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main -e "(do (use 'clojure.set) (union
#{:a} #{:b}))"
fails.
--Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
