I'm still not sure how you are printing these backtraces. For example, if I do:
user=> (use 'clj-backtrace.repl) user=> ("foo") user=> (.printStackTrace *e) It prints the normal Java backtrace. If instead I do: user=> (use 'clj-backtrace.repl) user=> ("foo") user=> (pst) It prints the cleaned backtrace. Could you provide REPL sessions like these that indicate the unexpected behavior? - Mark On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@laposte.net> wrote: > > On 03.01.2009, at 15:46, Mark McGranaghan wrote: > >> Thanks for trying the library, I'm glad you found it useful. It should >> not redefine any existing behaviour - could you share a REPL session >> showing the behavior that seemed to change? > > Nothing except what the library is supposed to do: clean up the > backtrace printouts. I am wondering how a simple (use) can change the > way the backtrace is printed. > > Konrad. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---