> > 2. If I want the Clojure functions that underlie the methods in the > > generated class used directly by my Clojure code as well (which I do), > > then I'm stuck having to either violate standard Clojure/Lisp function > > naming conventions in favor of Java-friendly naming or I have to write > > wrapper functions like: > > > (defn myMethod [obj] (my-method obj)) > > > Other than using the prefix and keeping the method names to one > > "word", is there a better way? > > Since gen-class is used to create Java classes, it's sensible that the > naming convention within the generated class be Java's.
I agree that the convention inside the generated class should be a Java convention (my original post was more of an experiment than an attempt to create a working class with that signature). However, I find myself wanting to write a clojure function that can be exposed to both Clojure and Java code, and I'd like to keep them in their respective paradigms. That is, in Clojure, I don't want to have to call (.myMethod foo) when I already have (my-method) defined. And in Java, I want to just use foo.myMethod(), not have to wrap up a call to RT.var().invoke(). I know I'm being picky, but it just seems cleaner this way... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
