> OK, good, thanks for the explanation. > > Is it desirable behavior? Is there some case where a programmer wants > this behavior? > > It's pretty scary to have to consider these hidden effects. Sort of > the opposite of FP.
If you write functions that work differently depending on a binding, then you are outside FP anyway. And at that point laziness may no longer be your friend. You will need to make sure things happen eagerly. There are probably some opportunities to generalize this with a macro. Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
