On Feb 16, 1:44 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My thoughts so far: > > > 4. The new model is definitely more complicated to understand than > > the previous model. There was already a certain degree of mental > > overlap between collections and the seq interface. Now, there is also > > the subtle distinction between a seq and a sequence. > > There will need to be good descriptions of these, but the similarity > is more in names than anything else - seqs are what they always > were - cursors, and sequences are just collections.
Would it therefore make sense to call them cursors and collections instead of seqs and sequences? Gavin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
