On Feb 26, 4:17 am, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@laposte.net>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 26.02.2009, at 01:51, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > > You raise interesting issues and I'd like to explore them further. I'm
> > > not sure the issues you have with type-tag-or-class dispatch are all
> > > that prohibitive. In any case, I've added a type function that returns
> > > the :type metadata or the class if none:
>
> > Thanks, that helps a lot! With a built-in universal dispatching
> > function, most of my problems should be solved. Another useful
> > function to have would be
>
> > (defn type-instance?
> >   "Evaluates x and tests if it is an instance of the type or class t.
> >    Returns true or false"
> >   [t x]
> >   (identical? t (type x)))
>
> > for type-based dispatching inside a function.
>
> or maybe generalize the existing 'instance? function to the above definition
> ?

I'm not sure I'd want to do that. You'd still need actual class
detectors.

Rich

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to