capitals seems pretty weird for a Lisp. Now that I think about it, perhaps foo-error isn't so bad. David
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I appreciate that they stand out. Again, this is similar to the > constants > > conversation earlier, visually marking the intended use is a good habit, > > IMHO. Of course this doesn't mean that error-kit should define the base > > error this way, but I intend to keep on wrapping my errors in earmuffs :) > > Since earmuffs already mean something different, perhaps there's > something else that would work? Maybe capitals, because they're a > kind of type name? Error, Odd-Number-Error? > > --Chouser > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
