Yeah. Personally, I don't think they should stand out any more than a
struct basis needs to stand out.
(defstruct person :fname :lname)
(struct person "Bob" "Joe")
(deferror parse-error {...})
(raise parse-error ...)
Defined errors are just variables in a namespace, whose siblings
include the namespace's functions, structs, and so on. I think that as
long as error-kit is really young and *error*, etc. aren't being bound
anymore, you might as well remove the asterisks for consistent style
with the rest of Clojure, or else the asterisk's meaning is diluted.
(As for continue, Chouser, I'm sure I'll use it eventually--bind-
continue especially.)
On Mar 3, 9:30 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> capitals seems pretty weird for a Lisp. Now that I think about it, perhaps
> foo-error isn't so bad.
> David
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > I appreciate that they stand out. Again, this is similar to the
> > constants
> > > conversation earlier, visually marking the intended use is a good habit,
> > > IMHO. Of course this doesn't mean that error-kit should define the base
> > > error this way, but I intend to keep on wrapping my errors in earmuffs :)
>
> > Since earmuffs already mean something different, perhaps there's
> > something else that would work? Maybe capitals, because they're a
> > kind of type name? Error, Odd-Number-Error?
>
> > --Chouser
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
