On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 10:07:29 PM UTC-6, Philip Markgraf wrote: > > Thank you, Alex and Andy. This answers my question regarding leading digit > in keywords. > > > Alex, > You describe an error with autoresolved keywords in my example. Is this > also true of the second example I posted (in response to Justin), which > does not use the user namespace? >
Yes > Am I correct to use double-quote inside a namespace, and double-quote, > namespace-alias, slash when using the keyword in another namespace? > No, in all of these cases you are using fully-qualified namespaces, not aliases. The double-colon is only for autoresolving based on the aliases of the current namespace, and you are not using aliases in any of your examples. For example, you could have done the following to use an autoresolved keyword based on the alias n1: (ns name2 (:require [name1 :as n1])) (::n1/015-00 name1/ex2) ;; invalid token Although note that you will still run into the second problem of qualified keywords with leading digit names, so the latter won't work. For something like this, you'll need to avoid the leading digit in the keyword name. Or you can programmatically create the keyword if you must: ((keyword "name1" "015-00") n1/ex2) . ;; "2" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
