Thanks Alex! Correct, the channel implementation takes care that "transduced" channels always pass elements through the transducer and the buffer. Also, a FixedBuffer allows running out of limit for those cases, see this example with a FixedBuffer of size 1 making space for 4 elements:
(def c (chan 1 (mapcat seq))) => #'psdk.hack-config/c (put! c "hola") => true (-> c .buf .buf) => (\a \l \o \h) However, the blocking semantics of a channel change if a buffer is enforced. You can't have a "transduced" channel for which all puts will block for a take. Not sure if this is too limiting for any practical case. For the case of expanding transducers, I am not sure if there would be sensible semantics for channel operations without a buffer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/a652870b-59c2-40f9-b4e0-7387e87de204%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
