> > union does an implicit distinct operation, as it returns a set. I > didn't think Clojure had multisets, unless we've had another Rich's > Time > Machine moment :)
Nope, it doesn't have multisets ... I somehow read that as "apply concat" rather than "apply union" ... maybe I need some more sleep :) > I generated 10 sets of 100 random integers between 0-200. Then I timed > 3000 iterations applied to 1 thru 10 sets, on a -server VM. I warmed > up > the JIT on each version a couple of times. > > First version / second version: > > "Elapsed time: 462.881526 msecs" "Elapsed time: 1.445784 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 901.305403 msecs" "Elapsed time: 357.005849 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 1334.729903 msecs" "Elapsed time: 783.21756 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 1746.563041 msecs" "Elapsed time: 1165.418231 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 2264.295812 msecs" "Elapsed time: 1549.46746 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 2569.731838 msecs" "Elapsed time: 1956.67962 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 2854.096121 msecs" "Elapsed time: 2349.644787 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 3278.285648 msecs" "Elapsed time: 2768.575964 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 3529.430695 msecs" "Elapsed time: 3136.699357 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 3854.478292 msecs" "Elapsed time: 3514.263823 msecs" > > It seems they're both linear complexity but the second is faster by a > noticeable constant. Fascinating! Looks good to me... -Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
