Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> writes: > I see two advantages to using with-test: > * documentation/usage examples as you pointed out,
Actually I meant that it's nicer for documentation to have the tests in a separate file since when you're trying to learn how to use the library initially, you don't care about the implementation. So it's easier to focus just on the behaviour when you only see the tests before you. But that's a minor point. > * and that makes me feel guiltier for nor updating them. Well that's a downside; if they are stored somewhere else it could be easier to ignore them. =) Depending on your editing style it may be annoying if your editor doesn't support having the two files open side-by-side. But I did notice you have the use test-is line commented out in the implementation; it seems a bit unfortunate to have to uncomment that to run the tests and hope you remember to re-comment it before you commit. > I'll add support for java.io.File and java.net.URL as an argument to > template/deftemplate/snippet/defsnippet in complement of String and xml > tree. Sounds great; thanks. -Phil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
