On Mar 31, 2:25 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2:18 pm, mikel <mev...@mac.com> wrote:
> What about predicate, or rule based dispatch - why hardwire the notion
> of types, traversal or matching?
Those are different names for the same pieces.
> This is simply an exhausting amount of talk - how about a prototype?
I promised to stop talking about my gf implementation.
> I'm skeptical there will be much utility left in the harness that
> hosted all of these plugin components. With no knowledge of how the
> pieces fit, it couldn't even do the most basic cache management or
> consistency checking jobs.
Okay. It works for me. No one else has to use it.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
