On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:47 PM, J. McConnell <jdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I guess only Rich can make the choice: statu quo, clojure (breaks >> maven artifact id), clojure-lang (breaks build.xml). > > Not that I have a strong stake in this, but I'd vote for going with > "clojure" and getting it right for 1.0.
Right. It's easier to change this pom before it goes into the public repo than after. When people are going to change their pom from some odd snapshot to 1.0 anyway, then this is probably a good time to sneak this artifactId change in too, no? > > - J. > > > > -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
