David, that seems to work. I think I can achieve my objectives with this strategy.
However, I must admit, I find it rather unsettling that collections of functions written inside of namespaces are fundamentally less composable than those that are not. It means that to remain extensible, I need to write two files for every group of functions -- one to hold the actual functions, and one to load the first file and wrap it inside of a namespace. Perhaps Clojure needs a variation of load that ignores the namespace, to make it possible to load the contents of one namespace into a new namespace? Or perhaps there is still a better way? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
