A point-free definition does not explicitly mention the values of the space on which the function acts.
See http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Pointfree. > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Richard Newman > <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the difference between 'conventional' and point-free style, by > the way. Many people view point-free as being somehow more elegant, > and I'm generally inclined to agree... apart from in cases like your > example, where a ton of partials need to be added. > > What is "point-free", exactly? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
