On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Chouser wrote:

> So in general 1 is in my opinion a fairly minor syntax
> thing, while 2 could be somewhat alleviated if Clojure had
> a string literal format that allowed un-escaped double
> quotes and left backslashes unmolested.  This would allow
> things like (infix #'''5*2''').  Again, not pretty but
> perhaps better than nothing.

...and then someone wants to embed python source in a clojure file,  
and comes calling on the clojure group to complain about the broken  
triple-quoted string literal reader macro. ;-)

- Chas

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to