> You need to prevent the modification of consuming by using ensure > rather than deref (@).
Oh - excellent point! I didn't think of that. When it useful to be able to deref inside a dosync without ensuring? Ensure seems like a more safe default of what I'd expect from a transaction. So why not make deref automatically ensure within a dosync? It takes a bit of care to remember to use ensure instead of deref in a dosync. Regards, Tim. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
