On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:24 PM, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One question: how would Java class imports be dealt with? I think it > should > > be unified: > > (ns foo > > (uses java.io :only [File FileInputStream] :as io)) > > I think this is a bad idea. Java (or other host) classes are not > Clojure functions
Not everything in a Clojure namespace is necessarily a Clojure function either. Anything a var can hold (so, in fact, any Object) can be in a Clojure namespace. The point was to simplify syntax, rather than to simplify the underlying mental model; the latter I agree can't simplify further since, as you say, the host interop is not the same as Clojure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
