Hi,

Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Unless there are some really great features added upstream in slime,
> fixing swank-clojure to work with their latest changes is a low priority.

this is a pity, at least for those of us, who also use Slime to do
some CL hacking.  For that setup it is quite common to always update
to CVS head because that may be the only version working with current
releases of, e.g., SBCL.  Well, currently I don't really do CL stuff,
it's just that I set up another machine doing lots of VC-checkouts...
I could just copy an older version of Slime there.

I'll take a look at it the next few days (er, evenings that is), if I
find the time.  No promises ;-)

Over there at Slime's people are thinking, the Clojure family forked
Slime, maybe that's not the worst idea.  Things would probably get
easier if there were only one backend to support.

Best regards,
Stefan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to