Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@googlemail.com> writes: >> Unless there are some really great features added upstream in slime, >> fixing swank-clojure to work with their latest changes is a low priority. > > this is a pity, at least for those of us, who also use Slime to do > some CL hacking. For that setup it is quite common to always update > to CVS head because that may be the only version working with current > releases of, e.g., SBCL. Well, currently I don't really do CL stuff, > it's just that I set up another machine doing lots of VC-checkouts... > I could just copy an older version of Slime there. > > I'll take a look at it the next few days (er, evenings that is), if I > find the time. No promises ;-)
Cool. I don't mean to discourage this work, I just mean that I have little personal motivation to implement it myself. > Over there at Slime's people are thinking, the Clojure family forked > Slime, maybe that's not the worst idea. Things would probably get > easier if there were only one backend to support. Honestly I don't know the server-side bit of swank-clojure that well; I've mostly been focusing on the elisp side. So I don't know the protocol that well myself; the server-side stuff was mostly written by jochu, the original author. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
