I'm guessing you're the author. A very interesting critique. Well written, and you've got guts posting it to this list.
There are a few very important factors you need to consider to have a complete critique, though. First, is the STM. This is THE killer feature of the language. Ironically, it gives Clojure its identity, and ridiculously clean design. Write a concurrent app with it and you'll see. You are right, that there aren't many books about how to program in Clojure. The current expectation is to use Lisp, Scheme, Erlang or Haskell resources to fill in the gaps right now. The Clojure community admittedly still filling in the gaps. I think if you spent a month writing a lot of Clojure, you would revise your criticism. Feel free to post any questions you have about the language to the list, and we'll do our best to answer them. Hope this helps, Sean On Dec 11, 4:04 pm, kusi <kusim...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://kusimari.blogspot.com/2009/12/analysing-clojure-programming-la... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
