On Jan 13, 11:53 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would like for logging to be less magical in its implementation. > > > I don't see the leveraging of macro evalutaion to be "magic"; I view > > it as a great advantage of clojure to not be limited to only compile- > > time and run-time (given the recent AOTC-compatibility demands, not > > everyone agrees). > > Having considered it a little more I agree with you on this. But maybe > the AOTC side would prefer a solution that uses eval instead of > macroexpansion. :-)
I submitted a patch that manages to do both, depending on the context. http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure-contrib/tickets/44
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
