On Mar 14, 5:42 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > really shows, that concurrent programming is not trivial. Not even for > „trivial“ things like a memoised function.
True. It's not too hard to be correct, but being correct and performant at the same time is a different issue... Thinking about your earlier comment: > discussion between Rich and Cliff Click: How to define the > borders of a transaction region?) That's what packing more than one value into a single atom kind of gives us, although in a limited way. This is one of my take-aways from this discussion. But you can't mix and match any arbitrary reference into such a "transaction", like with refs. Cheers Eugen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
