Hi,

On 29 Apr., 01:38, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1.  Don't include seq-contains?  The behavior you want can usually be
> achieved by using (some #{item} coll).  Disadvantage - if you're
> testing to see if the collection contains nil, that won't work.

Not entirely correct. (some #(= % item) coll) works always and is
basically how seq-contains? is implemented. However there are
opinions that some is not obvious enough.

Sincerely
Meikel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to