Hi, On 29 Apr., 01:38, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Don't include seq-contains? The behavior you want can usually be > achieved by using (some #{item} coll). Disadvantage - if you're > testing to see if the collection contains nil, that won't work. Not entirely correct. (some #(= % item) coll) works always and is basically how seq-contains? is implemented. However there are opinions that some is not obvious enough. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en