Hi, On 29 Apr., 01:43, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll wait for Rich to maybe chime in on seq-contains?. Other than seq- > contains? are people liking the new fns? Anybody having issues we > didn't anticipate? I was a little bit surprised about map-indexed and keep-indexed. Why specialised functions when (map f (indexed coll)) just works as well, but I must confess that having (f idx item) is nicer compared to (f [idx item]). On the other hand one could do (map #(apply f %) (indexed coll)), but again this doesn't play nice with #() functions. One thing I noticed in the implementation of keep-indexed. keepi is defined as (letfn [(keepi [idx coll] ...)] ...). However in the non-chunked case it is called as (keepi f (inc idx) (rest s)) resp. as (keepi f (rest s)). I think there is something goofy going on here. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
