As far as I can tell, clj-sandbox works by a set whitelist of arbitrary functions, which is not a very generic approach. It works for sandboxes like clojurebot, but not for other stuff.
A restricted eval in all likelihood will not refer directly to clojure.core, and it's much better allowing the caller to specify by namespaces which functions are accessible. Maybe in the future clojure.core functions could be tagged depending on whether they are purely-functional or have side-effects, and a caller to a restricted eval will be able to automatically generate a new "safe-core" namespace based on this division. On May 6, 1:37 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > maybe this can help:http://github.com/licenser/clj-sandbox > > Sincerely > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
