Not quite.

Syntax Before:
meta:  ^
type-hint:  #^

Syntax After:
meta: none, use meta
type-hint: ^

It's already in place on 1.2:

user=> (set! *warn-on-reflection* true)
true
user=> (defn foo [x] (.longValue x))
Reflection warning, NO_SOURCE_PATH:6 - reference to field longValue
can't be resolved.
#'user/foo
user=> (defn foo [^Integer x] (.longValue x))
#'user/foo


On May 17, 8:58 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
> > is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^
> > instead of #^?  Will all printers emit that? Will #^ become
> > deprecated?
>
> No. They are not equivalent and ^ is deprecated. #^ will remain doing
> what it did up to now. ^ will go away w/o replacement.
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to