> Actors in Erlang DO have mutable state, you're just discouraged from > using it. ;) No really, erl -man get and set. Sometimes you're forced > to use this despite the best of intentions.
I don't think anyone is trying to claim that it is impossible to mutate shared in state in an erlang actor. The claim is rather that the intended fundamental model implemented by an actor is not one of shared mutable state. -- / Peter Schuller -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
