+1 for Swing. We deal with multiple platforms here and have enough headaches with this so lets not hammer again on our poor brains :)))
Luc On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:59 -0700, Brian Schlining wrote: > +1 Swing. SWT comes with far to many deployment headaches. > > > > +1 Swing. > > > > > +1 Swing. There's a ton of documentation out there, and > it got some > > > serious love from Sun between java 5 and 6. > > > > > On May 27, 11:27 am, Laurent PETIT > <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Although I work with SWT at work, I would say Swing for 2 > reasons : > > > > >> * no additional dependency for users of your lib, and > *no need* for users > > >> of your lib to deliver different final apps binaries for > different platforms > > >> * may be easier to work with in your implementation > (?)-- > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > Brian Schlining > bschlin...@gmail.com > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > with your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
