On 28/05/2010, at 9:21 AM, Armando Blancas wrote: >> Remember, the actual API won't matter - that will be completely >> abstracted away. So try to focus on the framework's look and feel. >> Thanks! >> -Luke > > SWT, because of the native look and feel. I really don't like the > looks of Swing. As a user of some Swing app, I don't find solace from > thinking how convenient it was for the programmers to deliver that > thing to me. As a developer, dealing with the packaging/deployment > just comes with the job and the results, I think, are well worth the > effort.
+1 SWT. I think arguments that focus on the ease of deployment are misguided because an app is *used* far more times than it is deployed, so one really should focus on the quality of the end application. In any case, deployment and packaging for different platforms is easy to automate. Antony Blakey -------------------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
