On May 30, 8:11 pm, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2. Why is there no other way to determine an empty coll except (not > > (seq coll)). > > user=> (empty? []) > true
And in fact, the docs for (empty?) say: "Please use the idiom (seq x) rather than (not (empty? x))" Perhaps the seq docs should indicate empty? in some way. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
