And, by the way, after having looked into the compiler source, the current Master already uses the valeOf function.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com>wrote: > http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/02/01/valueof/ > > <http://tech.puredanger.com/2007/02/01/valueof/>Apparently, a program that > only access 1 integer (0) is only twice as fast when caching. > We are very far from the *10/20 that occurs. > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Mike Meyer < > mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: > >> >> >I think I pointed it out, and I reiterate it will probably not improve >> >performance a lot (Except if you use always the 5 same numbers). >> >> Reiteration won't make it true. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
