> WIth regards to benchmarking that accurately discounts loop overhead; > it seems to me that even if you apply elaborate logic, if the thing > you're benchmarking is so small that looping overhead becomes > significant, you risk making the benchmark subject to subtle > variations anyway,
Oops, sorry. I started writing something and meant to discard it, but accidentally hit send... -- / Peter Schuller -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
