This statement is interesting. Part of what makes the Python implementation so expressive is precisely the use of functional constructs like list comprehensions, ranges, and all the awesome stuff in itertools. A purely imperative implementation would probably be as clunky as the purely functional ones, but for different reasons.
-Fred -- Science answers questions; philosophy questions answers. On Jul 16, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Isaac Hodes wrote: > I have a Python implementation to show how nicely it can be expressed > in an imperitive language (though I suppose I dabbled in the > functional style initializing my return array). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
