sorry, wrong gist. here's one that tests for a function and only calls trampoline on it. all three of your test cases work for it.
http://gist.github.com/487019 g On Jul 22, 10:50 pm, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 July 2010 06:50, George Jahad <cloj...@blackbirdsystems.net> wrote: > > > i like it a lot! what do you think of adding trampoline to it like > > so: > > >http://gist.github.com/487019 > > Thanks! > > Trampoline in letrec automatically breaks all cases where the value > being bound to the local is not a function, so it would interfere with > what I'm trying to do. Having said that, it seems to me that it's a > very cool idea for a custom letfn variant permitting mutual recursion > of unbounded depth. I'll investigate this further. > > All the best, > Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
