>
>
> Robert McIntyre <bort...@gmail.com> Aug 21 03:58PM -0700
> ^<#12a9b8804b609349_digest_top>
>
> I am curious as to why first (and other functions) are defined in
> core as:
>
> (def
> ^{:arglists
> '([coll])
> :doc "Returns the first item in the collection. Calls seq on
> its
> argument. If coll is nil, returns
> nil."
> :added
> "1.0"}
> first (fn first [coll] (. clojure.lang.RT (first coll))))
>
> instead of:
>
> (def
> ^{:arglists '([coll])
> :doc "Returns the first item in the collection. Calls seq on its
> argument. If coll is nil, returns nil."
> :added "1.0"}
> first (fn first [coll] (clojure.lang.RT/first coll)))
>
> When the general consensus seems to be that the latter is more
> idiomatic/readable, especially for beginners?
>
> --Robert McIntyre
>
>
>
>
> Legilimens <bort...@gmail.com> Aug 21 08:39PM -0400
> ^<#12a9b8804b609349_digest_top>
>
> Apparently this is indeed an older holdover and the . calls are slowly
> being replaced with / as people make edits according to chouser.
>
> Would people be interested in a patch that replaces all of the older
> static calls using . to the newer method using / ?
>
> --Robert McIntyre
>
>
>
>
> +1 for the patch -- Adam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
