On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > reduce returns a single value; there's no collection to make lazy. > There is reductions, which returns the intermediate results of reduce > as a lazy sequence. > if f = cons in 'reduce f a seq', there is a collection. Though in this case, one should use foldr rather than foldl.
That lead to a question I have asked before, is there a lazy foldr in clojure ? A related question, what about unfold ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
